Monday, July 3, 2017

Listed Impacts from the Draft EIR for the Proposed Pleasant Hill CarMax

These are the potential impacts as listed in the Draft EIR.  Those issues not listed were not considered impacts in the Draft EIR and are not listed below.  Both the Pleasant Hill Architectural Review Commission and the Planning Commission have accepted these potential impacts.

  • The project may create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area.
  • The project may violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation.
  • The proposed project may have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  • The project may have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
  • Subsurface construction activities associated with the proposed project may damage or destroy previously undiscovered historic resources.
  • Subsurface construction activities associated with the proposed project may damage or destroy previously undiscovered archaeological resources.
  • Subsurface construction activities associated with the proposed project may damage or destroy previously undiscovered paleontological resources.
  • Subsurface construction activities associated with the proposed project may damage or destroy previously undiscovered human burial sites.
  • The project may expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving:
    i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated
    on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
    Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the
    area or based on other substantial evidence of a
    known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
    Special Publication 42.
    ii) Strong seismic ground shaking.
    iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
    liquefaction.
    iv) Landslides.
  • The project may result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
  • The project may be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse.
  • The project may be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property.
  • Construction and operational activities associated with the proposed project have the potential to degrade water quality in downstream water bodies.
  • The proposed project may alter the existing drainage pattern of the site and contribute runoff to downstream storm drainage facilities that would result in the potential for flooding or otherwise exceed the capacity of drainage systems.
  • The proposed project may locate structures within a 100-year flood hazard area.
  • Implementation of the project would result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies.
  • The project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k).
  • The project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1.

No comments:

Post a Comment